Navigation

Contrary to the threads on 4chan, this series sucks. It really does suck. By episode 5 when the Lolicon Scientist appears it's already too late. They should've had Caro's transformation sequence longer too...

Anyway, in case you haven't watched any after episode 1, here's a quick recap:

Episode 1) Training
Episode 2) Talking
Episode 3) Training AND WELCOME TO TRAINING SQUAD 6!!!
Episode 4) Training
Episode 5) Combat
Episode 6) Training

Wow... exciting isn't it? Watching a bunch of girls do magic training sure is interesting! Add to that shitty plot devices and horrible animation. Not memorable as Musashi but still quite bad.

So in summary. Show is dropped, go watch yesy's.

P.S. The Nanoha mini site is taken down. Go find your own translator for this shitty show.

Fuck this show sucks.

Kanna: About that deleted 4chan post I made about a week ago. That was my stupidity at work. Apologies for starting fansub drama. From now on I won't care anymore.

Posted by Kanna on Monday, April 30, 2007  
5240 Reads

Comments

    1234   >

No. 1924

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:02
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Yeah, I agree. Better pay more attention to Bokurano :P

No. 1925

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:08
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Are you picking anything up to replace it? I'd suggest you be the first group to ever do a quality translation of Gurren-Lagann, but that's probably not loli enough, is it?

So I suggest Dennou Coil instead.
No. 1926

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:09
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

No, we're waiting for the summer wave of shows now. So don't expect anything other than Bokurano, Ryu, and the last ep of class 5-2 for a while.

No. 1927

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:20
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Is there any hope that if this show picks up, will you subb it again?

No. 1928

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:21
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Oh well no need to look here anny more then...... Sad you WAS great.....

No. 1915

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:21
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

lulz you guys probably drop it because of the fansub drama that makes you look like shit. Like the one you post about Anonymous bitching on 4chan and they reply to you but you delete it.

No. 1914

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:22
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Oh well.

No. 1935

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:23
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

"Sucks" is a subjective term, and I beg to differ with your evaluation ("shitty", what an insightful and enlightened comment, by the way). To me, even if you provide something for free and you can do whatever you choose, it mostly looks like a (poor) excuse to drop the series anyway.
I do not have a problem with you dropping something: however I *do* have a problem with your attitude, the same snobbish attitude that made you refuse to correct "Earth Tear" in "Arthia" in Ryu Knight.
No. 1936

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:26
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Meh.

No. 1937

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:30
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

I don't see how it's a poor excuse. We did ep 1, we didn't like it, so we dropped it. That was the reason. None of us approved of it being subbed, except Drago.

> "refuse to correct "Earth Tear" in "Arthia" in Ryu Knight."

metachronism, the other translator who did Ryu had talked to one of the production staff when he was doing the first eps and he did confirm it was in fact "Earth Tear."
No. 1938

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:32
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Nope. Never.

No. 1939

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:35
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

"None of us approved of it"... This proves my point perfectly. You didn't want to sub it in the first place. Why did you start then? You just wasted your own free time.

And about "metachronism", I suggest you look up the discussion that came up on animesuki back then. As far as I can remember, there was a refusal to change "for consistency reasons".
No. 1940

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:38
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

I figured you might enjoy Dennou Coil because it seems to have a bit of a Zettai Shounen vibe going on.

Also, little girls.
No. 1941

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:41
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Yeah, I did waste my free time. Blame Drago. He was being a baby about it.

http://forums.animesuki.com/showpost.php?p=143988&postcount=73

Looked up. Your turn.
No. 1942

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:45
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

We might, but the translators of which only one is active can only take on so much work. It also looks like LordBrian's going on vacation, so we're trying to minimize the workload as well.

No. 1943

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:48
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Heh, unfortunately the Ryu Knight manga was published officially in my own country (Italy) using author approved names, which report "Arthia".

In any case, I want to return on topic with my last post on the matter. I don't want to blame "anyone" as I actually like StrikerS, I only find the posting as an excuse and a show of a rather displeasing attitude.

But again, it's "teh internetz"...
No. 1944

Kanna
April 30, 2007
10:50
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Well, can't change what you think, so we'll just leave that. Thanks for your opinion. Glad we cleared up the Earth Tear issue though.

No. 1945

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
10:53
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

All right, I see. Let's hope somebody else decent picks it up, then.

No. 1946

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:05
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

i was aleady in a strange mood today..
"hey StrikerS was dropped" ...
.
.
.
owww fcuk it.
No. 1947

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:14
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

You guys do realise that expecting A's level action from something that's twice the size of A's isn't very reasonable, right? Or how the first half of StrikerS (e.g 1-13) would naturally correspond to the original 13 episodes of Nanoha, and how the second half of StrikerS (14-26) will most likely have the same action pace of A's?

Or is that too hard to realize? Meh. Before you go hunting monsters, you've got to level up...
No. 1948

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:22
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Also, you don't "owe" anyone a translation, yes, but despite what 4chan might have also been saying about yesy/speedsubs/ZOMG NANOHA/etc, you've got more people, way more people waiting for your translations than you can imagine. I've definitely heard of quite a few myself. And also, this is a rather lame attempt at hoping you'll change your mind, but -- hold a poll at least. Ask everyone what they think about it instead of acting on the "feeling" that Nanoha sucks. This would be a first in terms of dropping a series because it "sucks"?

No. 1949

Kanna
April 30, 2007
11:26
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

It's not 4chan's influence that brought us to this point. It's hatred of the show from within the group. The only two people who wanted to do this show was LordBrian and Dragosmore. You know, now that I think about it, maybe that's why assmo ran away...

No. 1950

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:34
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

They said they want to drop it, why the hell would they hold a poll about it? It's their choice, not the leechers.

No. 1951

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:35
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

You guys have some real issues internally, then. I'd expect, seeing the amount of work that went into translating and building a pretty damned good Nanoha StrikerS site from scratch, that there would at least be some dedication to it. Oh well, if it's really some Infernal Affairs shizzle we can't really fight that. Still, a poll, like I said. If you want sheer numbers for convincing.

No. 1952

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:36
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

"lame attempt at"

Learn to read, etc.
No. 1953

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:38
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Learn to quit failing. Once Trial made their mind, they don't go back on that.

No. 1954

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:41
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Yeah, Trial. I wonder what group you're talking about there. Btw.

All because 99 black swans pass by doesn't mean that the 100th will be black, but I suppose that allusion flies over your head like reason does. We're not dealing with emotionless translating machines here, these guys are still human and (hopefully) open to any reasonable pleas or questions us fans might have.

In other words, stfu.
No. 1955

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:44
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

It's a fact that once they decide on something, they won't turn back. And I'm sorry for make a mistake on spelling, really.

No. 1956

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:49
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

oh ok lol, sure. Fact. Cool.

No. 1957

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:51
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

lulz lame attempt are cool.
Learn to quit failing and lurk moar faggot.
No. 1958

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
11:51
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Nanoha was the only good anime Triad had, other than Higurashi.
Since both are gone, Im out. -.-

All the other anime here sucks...
No. 1959

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
12:06
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Call me when that "fact" gets recorded down in an encyclopaedia somewhere, otherwise continue trolling a Triad thread, asswipe. Thanks.

No. 1960

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
12:13
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Don't have to tell me, trolling is what I do best. Now you go on and keep dreaming like a little bitch.

No. 1961

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
13:07
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

With taste that bad, nobody's going to miss you.

No. 1962

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
13:08
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

I'm with you. :/

No. 1963

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
13:10
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

No, I think you'll find that it is you that in fact sucks. ;)

LOL I'm trolling the intarwebs!
No. 1964

LordBrian
April 30, 2007
13:27
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Except for the fact that everyone but one Anonymous thought that ours was better, I agree. It has nothing to do with the fact that we totally hate the show and have better things to waste our time on. Nope.

No. 1965

LordBrian
April 30, 2007
13:34
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Hey now, I didn't want to do it. I only thought we should do it to avoid having to explain to bitchy leechers who would refuse to believe anything we said about the matter. Guess it was a lose-lose situation.
No. 1966

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
13:34
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Man I was looking forward to the high quality/low size mpeg... what am I gonna do now...

No. 1967

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:15
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Haha oh well, looking forward to Bokurano 3... Whens that one comin around?

No. 1968

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:22
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

I approve of this, shit really sucks . Hope we'll get Today in class 5-2 faster thanks to that (yeah right)

No. 1969

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:28
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

The reason you dropped it because you're slow as fuck and nobody gives a rats ass about your subs anyway lulz gtfo

No. 1971

LordBrian
April 30, 2007
14:48
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

I want to do Coil, but the timing really is pretty bad. Plus, there's at least one group already signed up to do it, and at least a couple more thinking about it. Oversubbing is for losers.

No. 1972

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:50
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Not true! I was waiting (and was going to wait as long as it had to) for Triad release.
Honestly I don't know what to do now with this series.
No. 1973

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:55
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Just get the Nanoha-DGz version and save yourself a bunch of waiting.

No. 1974

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:55
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Triad fucking fails!
Fuck you for forcing me to get fucking yesy subs. Fuck 4chan.
No. 1975

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
14:57
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

The reason anyone actually cared about Triad was Azumanga and Nanoha. Hope you still have supporters after this.

No. 1976

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
15:00
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Hahaha... oh wow.

No. 1977

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
15:02
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Waiting is not a problem, but quality is.

No. 1978

Anonymous
April 30, 2007
15:05
Re: Nanoha StrikerS sucks; sage; DROPPED

Now Drago can work on getting Nodame out faster~

    1234   >

Add a new Comment